ALL the Democrats want that of course, including ALL the courts.  They want one party rule, like California.  Essentially, they want to DICTATE their Communist agenda to the entire country.  States won't matter anymore as the METRO areas in each state are all Democrat, and will control the state in entirety.  They see this trend, and that's why they want to abolish the Electoral College.  States don't have an EC, and we see what that is causing. 

Let's be honest.  The Media, Education, Corporate America, most of our GOVERNMENT, and Judicial System HATES that private citizens can legally own, and carry firearms.  They view us as a threat to them, and also believe many of us are "unqualified" to use firearms.  The prevalent thought is you must be some type of government official like police, and military to be "qualified" to have a gun.  This, of course is B.S. because many citizens are well trained, and very qualified, even more so than most police, or military member. 

This is EXACTLY the type of thinking the 2A is meant to resist.  When our politicians, and government officials believe they are "special" and entitled means they are now acting like ROYALTY.  We all know what happens next.   

That's not the way half the country see it.  All they see is Trump trying to be a dictator and Acosta as a righteous member of the fourth estate standing up to him.

I understand that, but the job of the Media should not be to make activist speeches for one view only, and disrupt a press conference.  I thought their job was to objectively REPORT what the President says during a press conference?  Yes, ask pointed questions, but not make activist speeches to ONLY support one view point.

I think it's brilliant. What better place than the press briefing to go nuclear. The right to petition is not limited to place, person or office. Why do it on a street corner when the disruption is so much more effective in front of the prez, and all the press, and cameras in the center of power?  In fact, you made it very plain, Acosta wants to deny the govt from it's message, and substitute his own in its place. Sounds like a petition of grievance to me. Potato, potahto.

Except the message of the President is Freedom, and Liberty, and the message of Acosta is Oppression, and Tyranny.  So now we have the forces of evil disrupting our freedom.  But again, he has every venue known to man to protest and rebel, so don't use my time in which to do so. 

^^^^^^^^^^I think you are over thinking it.  Acosta is not rebelling.  He is being intentionally disruptive to deny the President the ability to articulate his message and substituting his own message in an aggressive manner.  If Acosta wants to protest and rebel, he can do so on the air, on any street corner, or public square.  This is the Presidents Press Briefing.  It's his show.  Not Acosta's, nor CNN.  So I think your entire premise is BUNK.

From the article:

A Democratic congressman has proposed outlawing “military-style semiautomatic assault weapons” and forcing existing owners to sell their weapons or face prosecution, a major departure from prior gun control proposals that typically exempt existing firearms.
In a USA Today op-ed entitled “Ban assault weapons, buy them back, go after resisters,” Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., argued Thursday that prior proposals to ban assault weapons “would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come.”


Swalwell proposes that the government should offer up to $1,000 for every weapon covered by a new ban, estimating that it would take $15 billion to buy back roughly 15 million weapons — and “criminally prosecute any who choose to defy [the buyback] by keeping their weapons.”

This is what Hillary was advocating during her campaign.  Australian, and UK style forced bans and confiscation, and called it a "buy back".  However, it would be mandatory.  Their goal is to ban all semi automatic firearms, then go after the rest when people get used to them being gone. 

Except now there are more semi automatic "Sporting" rifles, and pistols in the hands of private citizens than ever before. 

Some of my relatives don't like Trump.  I do.  If politics comes up, I am very honest about my beliefs.  If their feeling get hurt, that is on them.  I try to be as polite, and non emotional about it as I can.  We typically just agree to disagree and move on.  Pass the stuffing please.