2041
Spin Zone / Re: Best reason yet to vote for Trump!
« on: March 05, 2016, 11:14:21 AM »![](http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/sonicfanchara/images/3/3b/Well_bye.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20131018143443)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
According to Matt Schlapp, chairman of CPAC, Trump wanted to dictate the terms of his visit to CPAC, including not taking questions. CPAC wouldn't accept those terms, so Trump didn't show.Unless the other candidates got to dictate their terms, which I doubt, then I'm not sure why he thinks he can get special terms. The speeches should be pretty interesting from the other candidates now that Trump isn't going.
Coward comes to mind.
I don't think they should be handled at the federal level, but some of the questions are actually good questions and would have allowed me to better understand the core values of the candidates. But OTOH, why does it matter when its outside the scope of the job, kinda like gettingBy saying it's a 10th Amendment issue, that does tell you about their core values. It tells you they believe in the enumerated powers and what should and should not be a federal issue.a blow joboral sex in the Oval Office, right?
I've always liked Kasich, but he is now labeled as the "establishment" guy. I think he's done a good job as Ohio Governor. However, he has not shot.Rubio is also considered the establishment guy. Kasich doesn't have a chance, even if he does win Ohio.
"Blacks were forced into poor housing and poor schools up until the mid and late 1960s. In 2006 there were a record number of cases of discrimination in lending. Preventing tens of thousands from getting financing to purchase homes and autos.This has been proven false. There is no conspiracy amongst lenders to prevent blacks from getting loans. Lenders are in the business of making money, just like any other business, and they would have gone under had they denied one particular group from getting loans.
Blacks were not given the opportunity to vote until 1964. Even then, 1000s were murdered for trying. In addition, they were also forced to do things such as recite the Declaration of Independence to get to vote. Nearly impossible...."- T.F.You started another thread on this already and I posted there.
Yes, the past is denied by ignoring the impact on the present.Please cite, specifically, how in 2016, we are denying the past and the impact on the present. Be specific.
This is what you mock and oppose. And your ridicule and mockery is what divides us.Wrong. What divides us is continuing to hold onto the past while refusing to move forward. Nobody denies the past or says that it's a bright spot in our history (I'm speaking only on the issue of racism when referring to the past). Nobody wants to repeal the 13th or 14th Amendments. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton continue to make race a business because it lines their pockets. I don't believe for one second that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are interested in advancing civil rights or they'd setup their main headquarters in Chicago and start dealing with the massive black on black crime, lack of black employment and the problems there. They only show up when a black person is murdered and it hits the national news and becomes a prominent issue.