I wouldn't be surprised if Trump's populism and celebrity status scares the shit out of the DNC.  Trump's mouth will lose him this election.

How??!! So far anything stupid he says just gets him more support. In a rational world, his mouth should have terminated his run months and months ago, yet here he is.

It will be interesting to see what happens with regard to the FBI. I have little doubt that Lynch will not follow the recommendations should they be to prosecute, but will the FBI remain resolute and complain bitterly if this is the case? Will FBI even recommend prosecution? They might cave to political pressure, or realize they are wasting resources on something that will never be prosecuted.

I really do believe that Hillary is in a protected class of people and will see no meaningful punishment for anything she has done to date.

The building dropped from the bottom not the floors where the impact happened.
I concede my original position on the bucking of the North and South Towers.  The falling building I was referring to is #7
https://youtu.be/8T2_nedORjw?t=2m37s

And here is a rebuttal-

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html

The towers didn't go limp.  The heating in the building would be uneven due to where the airplane impacted, causing that portion of the building to soften.  Also, from what I understand the center structure wasn't hit by the airplane and should have been intact.

Paraphrased as best I can from Bobby: 'Concrete undergoes an explosion (can't recall the term he used) from the boiling and expansion of the trapped water at temperatures below that of molten steel, this didn't occur in the videos.  Also the black smoke at the bottom is indicative of where the pressure forces exist....I would have expected to see fire on the roof of Tower #7 but that didn't happen.'

You didn't see concrete explode because skyscrapers are made of steel!! Softened steel is failing steel. The steel structure of the building fails under tremendous weight from the floors above and the impact of that weight falling on the floors below cause a cascading effect going downward. Why is that so hard to believe for you and "Bobby"??

A nice demonstration of how the twin towers collapsed on 9-11 happened quite by accident several years ago in Oakland, CA. The freeway overpass pictured below failed and came down one night. This overpass's structure is built entirely out of steel. Notice how it has a limp noodle kind of look to it.

Why did this bridge come down? One night a truck driver, hauling a full load of gasoline went around the curve too fast and went off the bridge. The resulting fire burned beyond anybody's ability to put it out. Later that evening, the bridge collapsed, not due to any explosion, but just because of the heat.



Here's a video but I think is is after it had already collapsed. It happened at 3:45 in the morning and this was in the days before everyone carried a video camera around with them, so I don't think there is any actual footage of the collapse.



Gasoline can weaken, soften and even melt steel. An airliner full of fuel can take down a building.

Stop talking complete nonsense and people will take you seriously.

You do realize that the more people call people out on bats shit crazy theories, the tighter they those people purporting them cling to them, right?

And even if you do post about all the new shit Hillary is doing, you still maintain that Trump is just as bad, or worse than Hillary because of what you think he MIGHT do.

It's not like Trump existed in a vacuum before the primaries. He has a long and well documented history of stuff that he has said and stuff that he has done that gives a very good idea of the type of man he is. What he is is corrupt and self centered with little concern for anyone else.

Of course the same can be said for Hillary, but then again, you think Trump is better based entirely on what you think she MIGHT do. Basically, both choices are absolutely horrible and if a third option that is even slightly better than these options should present itself, thinking people should jump at that chance.

I still don't see the logic in the GOP picking someone other than Trump. I understand the down ballot concerns, but the GOP picking someone else may signal panic and negative results could happen then, too.

Accept that many in the GOP might actually care about the country. I know, that's not possible, right? There's status quo and there's crazy train to ruin. Trump is that train and many of us see it.