Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If it is "written in plain English", why do we need lots of good reading to define and explain?
This is my point. It's the nature of the beast that the Constitution must be interpreted.
Understanding the english language has a lot to do with it.
They managed to ignore the part about:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
So how many of you guys are members of a well-regulated militia?
If we want this, and all future investigations, to be impartial, what is the balance between letting the special counsel do his job and answering to Congress?
Coming forward in what manner? This is still an on-going investigation and thus it makes sense that certain information isn't being released to the press, nor should it be.
Unless I missed something, I'm not sure that it's been proven that the fake dossier led to the FISA warrant. I know it's speculated that it has, but I don't recall seeing confirmation. It makes a difference, especially since Comey said that it was "salacious."
You said he should be charged, so I asked which statutes you think he violated. You didn't answer but instead tried to turn it around.
This is an investigation in search of a crime.
There is nothing new in this article. It's just the same information that's already out there being repeated, again.
What statutes did he violate?
Indicting the entire FBI is a bit of a stretch. No doubt there are issues and it goes to the top (Comey, McCabe).
Why shut down Mueller? It just makes Trump look like he's afraid of something when in fact, there is no evidence of collusion. Just let the investigation play out.
What would Mueller be investigated by Congress for? Exceeding his mandate? Criminal charges against whom, exactly, and for what?
How would you restructure the FBI?
Politico wrote about a few top media and political figures and how they dealt with being mentioned by President Trump on Twitter. For one Hillary Clinton supporter, liberal Democrat Alan Dershowitz says his family has seen better days. Dershowitz, a lawyer, is seen regularly on CNN, Fox News, and other outlets defending some of President Trump's decision, arguing there is no grounds for an obstruction of justice charge after he fired FBI Director James Comey earlier this year. While hoping that former Vice President Joe Biden challenges Trump in 2020, the liberal lawyer has said he’s lost several pounds this year, thanks to friends not inviting him to dinner anymore. He said his closest friends have told him that he’s 100 percent right in his arguments defending Trump's decision to fire Comey, but added that he should also shut the f**k up. In all, Dershowitz says he’s merely defending the principles of the Constitution, not Trump—though that’s fallen on deaf ears from his liberal colleagues.
More than any other President, Obama politicized the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS, EPA, NASA, NOAA, Interior, and many other agencies, and departments. I hope Trump is removing the leadership down to Bureau heads that display political hostility towards the current Administration, and thus hostility towards the American citizens.
