Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rush

Pages: 1 ... 160 161 [162]
2416
Spin Zone / Re: Who are the actual Trump Supporters?
« on: December 30, 2016, 12:58:08 PM »
I'm a lukewarm supporter. I didn't vote for him in the primary but did in the general of course, because this country cannot survive Hillary, she'd just continue the Obama slide into oblivion.

I am more hopeful about him now that he's been elected; he is becoming more "presidential" (less insane?).  But I understood all along that his extremist rants, like deporting all illegals and killing the families of terrorists, were designed to gain attention, and hence actually successfully win the election, more than literal promises he'd fulfill.  I had no problem with that.  It certainly wasn't as down and dirty and duplicitous as some of the things Hillary's campaign did.

I still have reservations about exactly how he is going to achieve the goal of bringing jobs back to the U.S.  Setting tariffs against imports for example would be the wrong way to do it. This would raise consumer prices, which has always been my beef with U.S. workers demanding the jobs stay home. They want union wages, and minimum wage laws, and the Feds set regulations about safety, environment, etc., plus high taxes, all the costs of which, naturally, manufacturers just pass along to the consumer.  To restrict imports as a way to force goods to be made on our soil, without addressing these reasons the jobs went overseas in the first place, will be disaster for the consumer's pocketbook.

And we need cheap, abundant energy. Trump needs to put an end to this movement to destroy fossil fuel.  Fuel cost impacts every single thing we buy, use, eat or do.  Perhaps no other single item is as important for him to do than to reverse what the left has done to destroy good energy in this country; closing coal plants, killing the nuclear industry, banning offshore drilling, subsidizing "green" energy so the masses do not understand how expensive and inefficient it actually is. Trump understands this but I don't know if he can fight the uphill battle of climate change hysteria.

I guess what I don't want to see is some kind of heavy handed dictatorship methods, the thing the liberals seem to think is a foregone conclusion with Trump. He's basically Hitler, you know, according to them.  Well he isn't. But like Obama, he could abuse executive powers and I'm a little wary of that. And he will have a major influence on the country for generations with the SC nominations. Trump is not going to outlaw gay marriage or any of the other stuff the snowflakes and crybabies are all panicked about. But who ends up on the SC will have an impact on these issues, and being libertarian, I'm more a social liberal, so I'm wary of that.  But I feel that economic collectivism must be avoided at ALL costs, and trumps social freedoms by a huge margin. So I fervently hope the SC positions are filled by anyone but a leftist.

Trump is not an ideologue. (This is why some on the Republican right reject him.) I guess my preference would have been a libertarian ideologue in a perfect world. But Trump is a businessman who will negotiate or bend, or change position as needed to accomplish his goal.  This is why I'm wary of him, and only a lukewarm supporter. His flip flop on some gun rights issues for example.  But, it might turn out to be a good thing because there's nothing more dangerous than a rigid thinking ideologue, on any end of the spectrum.  Those are the types who will keep a utopian ideal in mind while people around them suffer.  A pragmatic businessman on the other hand, will see the reality of the journey to the goal as well as the goal itself, and will see the nuances, variations, compromises along the way, that need to be managed to actually make the good thing happen.

For example, I expect Trump to flip flop on immigration when he sees that although Americans SAY they want the jobs that the illegals are taking, in reality they won't actually take them unless they get a high wage, which of course, means high prices for the consumer, and of course, those same Americans will then bitch about high prices.

But immigration is a touchy subject, and the real problem is cultural. When a people invade a land not to assimilate, but to replace that land's culture with their own, in the end, that country will cease to exist. This is the heart of the "nationalism" that Trump tapped into during the campaign.  Trump voters want to keep America America - no, NOT to go back to slavery - but to retain a culture supportive of free enterprise, prosperity, relative safety, and relative freedom from government molestation, that the immigrants from the century before last sought when they came through Ellis Isle. 

How Trump will reconcile these forces to result in a country with good employment, low prices, increasing wealth for the middle class, declining poverty, and a reasonable immigration policy that welcomes the hardworking, law abiding applicant who wants to actually become an American, regardless of skin color or ethnicity, remains to be seen.

I am guardedly optimistic.

2417
Spin Zone / Re: The Clinton Archipelago
« on: December 21, 2016, 08:57:36 PM »
I don't post any political on FB.  Nothing at all, don't reply to anything, don't LIKE anything.  No matter WHAT I posted I would piss off half my friends and nobody would change their mind.

I got into some political discussions on FB this election because I have a couple of young nieces who were voting for the first time and were being brainwashed by the zomghegrabbedpussy hysteria and needed some facts and history filled in before they lost all grasp on reality and threw their vote to the "deserving vagina".  They were undecided and I had influence and that was the platform. But it was under protest - I have grown to HATE Facebook. The only reason I haven't deactivated my account is because some people I care about use Facebook to post updates about themselves (like their progress fighting cancer).

2418
Spin Zone / Re: How could we split up the country?
« on: November 12, 2016, 11:11:28 PM »
The divide is mostly urban vs rural.  I am coming to the realization that it's cultural more than ideological. The urban culture has become completely disconnected from people that live closer to the earth and in small communities. Paradoxically they claim to care about the planet, but they are now generations away from having to grow their own food. They don't actually have a relationship with nature yet they see themselves as protectors of their ideal vision of "the environment" (a vision based in fantasy).  They do not supply their own energy, it comes to them over wires and they barely have any understanding of how it gets there. They feel superior to "country hicks" and "rednecks" and with every generation the separation becomes wider. The overwhelming majority of people have barely any understanding of the economy, couldn't give you a definition of "socialism" if their lives depended on it. They vote Democrat simply because they are surrounded by others who vote that way, and are steeped in media that paints conservatives as the Face of Evil.

This country is in reality a huge red mass with small spots of blue, but the small spots are so densely populated, and so ignorant of the people in the red areas, that they exist in a seething self important bubble. The big shock of the Trump win is that they were forced to recognize that real people exist in that empty "flyover country". These inferior "rednecks" forced them to take notice by denying them the assumed first female President. It's just taking a toy from a toddler is all. I'm convinced that the great majority of rioters and cry babies have no real clue about the policy differences between Trump and Hillary, they are simply shocked that people they so look down upon were able to take away their expected result.  I don't even think they give a crap about Hillary.  Their real problem is they feel like a parent swooped in and took something away from them, and that parent is the horrible, racist, unenlightened stupid person they have, until now, forgot existed. The cities don't like being reminded we exist because without us, they have no food and no energy. This is their deep subconscious fear. Their hatred of us is due to their dependence on us.  Like a toddler resenting his dependence on mommy and daddy. But it's worse. It's more like masters who depend on slaves to work the plantation, or royalty in a medieval castle who have serfs that must turn over a large portion of their crops and goods. They are most comfortable pretending we don't exist, as long as they get their food and energy (and tax dollars).  You can expect extreme efforts to overthrow the Electoral College, because the EC is what gives us large red areas power.

There is no possible way to divide the country. It will be the Big House with no fields or woods. The Castle with no hunting lands or tenants.  The blue areas cannot separate and survive, even the blue states are mostly red when you look at it by county.  For a long time now the trend has been for the population to move from rural to urban and as far as I can see, that imbalance will continue to grow.  That may mean if Republicans continue to win by EC, the popular vote will go the other way more often, until even the EC won't be enough for Republican wins.  As people move to the cities, their children are "absorbed" into the urban culture.

So I expect this nation will go Democrat again before long. If we're lucky we'll have eight years of Trump and an economic boom, but it will all be reversed again because Democrats don't grasp economics. They don't see the connection between lower taxes and individual prosperity; they vote on emotion and "causes" not based in fact and reality.  We'll eventually decline into socialist Hell and probably break apart into fiefdoms, or be forced to stay together like the Soviet Union.

2419
Spin Zone / Re: A message for 'Gimp and Lucifer
« on: November 09, 2016, 10:28:02 AM »

I still think Trump is a pig, but he's our pig now.  It's up to us to make sure he keeps his promises, and doesn't turn away from the messages that bought him a win.


Agree. I didn't vote for Trump in the primary.  But during the campaign, I received email from the Trump campaign asking me, personally, what my problems are and what I would like Trump to do to fix them. The email included space to write UNLIMITED CHARACTERS my suggestions and opinions. Then Trump issued the Contract with Voters and I saw that he listened and addressed my concerns. (Oh I know he didn't personally read them, but mine plus millions of others like me, he DID listen to.)

It remains to be seen if he actually does what he promises. I still have some problems with some of his proposed policy and position on some issues.

And he is still unlikeable, even a bit repulsive to me.  But here is the bottom line. He heard and responded when I said our retirement fund is not growing. He heard when I said several of my family members were laid off their jobs. He heard when I said I am crushed under too many regulations from a distant government who doesn't understand how my quality of life is eroded by their meddling.  He heard when I said our taxes are way too high. He heard me say several of my doctors have quit their practices and my health insurance premiums have gone up.

Trump heard all this, HILLARY DID NOT.

Trump is still a pig, but I am 60 years old and face my old age, during which I would like to be comfortable, have some cash to spend, have good doctors, and maybe even be able to leave something for my children.  I have a new grandbaby I do not want to leave a decayed corpse of a country to.  At this point I don't care if he is a pig and he grabs women's pussies.  I am going to be selfish FOR ONCE IN MY LIFE.  I voted my wallet and my future and the future of my children and grandchildren because if Hillary won, things would only continue to get worse. That much was crystal clear.

Will Trump keep his promises to me?  Will he fix this country?  I have no idea.  But at least he asked me about my pain, and responded to what I said.

I hope the Republican party elite is hearing the message too:  We suffering middle class, working class and poor are SICK of you political elite.  My eyes were open in the last two months of this campaign. I was with you up to and past the primary, but some of you in your lack of support for Trump to defeat Hillary showed your true colors, and this spoke loud and clear: You too are disconnected from the suffering of me and the rest of "everyday Americans".   Screw you, along with the whole Democrat party.

2420
Spin Zone / Re: Deplorables and Rednecks
« on: October 12, 2016, 03:27:21 PM »
The Democrat elite look down upon most of the country, except those that can donate, and/or live on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, and places like that.

I'll throw in many of the Republicans.  It's the DC insiders. They are SO out of touch.

2421
Spin Zone / Re: Wait ... Trump is not done
« on: October 10, 2016, 11:56:00 AM »
I just read in "Freakonomics" that it's not money that wins an election, it's appeal.  People think the candidate that gets the most donation support wins, and there may be a correlation, but it's not the cause.  Actually it's the candidate with the most "appeal".  Well, if that is true, I'm hoping Donald has more appeal than Hillary. As despicable as he can be, he is at least entertaining. Hillary comes off as an ice queen.

On the other hand, there are two things that really worry me. First, the groundwork was set for this sex scandal to hurt Donald. It didn't hurt Bill Clinton because that was years ago, before the onset of the current climate of paradoxical Victorianism.  In today's world of filthy sexual content everywhere you look, the idea that actual men want actual sex is now condemned. Young first time voters know no different. Females in the 18 to twenty-something year old category, have actually bought the idea that males should respect a "bubble" around them, never to cop a feel, and men should see women wear the skimpiest most skin tight revealing clothing without so much as having a sexual thought.  Girls today actually think this way. They are beyond clueless.  And young males buy it hook line and sinker. Because young males want young females, and they will believe anything they think the young females want them to. So you have a whole generation of first time voters who are shocked, shocked I tell you!  at the Donald tape.  I'm not sure Trump can survive this. I think a lot of young voters were considering Trump because they're not so naive as to have completely missed how Hillary is now the entrenched corrupt "establishment" and may have gone to Trump for being an outsider. But they're SO brainwashed about sex - they are the generation raised on "pedobear" hysteria - that this tape has leveraged it to the max, I fear that generation is hopelessly lost. I still feel they dislike Clinton but now may go third party instead. Which incidentally, will be Jill Stein because they're just as brainwashed about climate change being the country's biggest problem.

The second thing is I believe the corrupt Democrat party and Hillary and her cronies will do ANYTHING at this point to hold onto power and we have seen nothing yet. They are going to sink so low, I would not be surprised if they get a woman to flat out make up a rape story about Donald.  Or maybe try to get him assassinated.  At the very least there will be massive voter fraud.  Worst case scenario, they'll cook up a reason for Obama to declare martial law and suspend elections.  I don't want to be too tin foil hat conspiracy theory about it, but I just have a feeling about this. The leftists have been on a long journey from outside to inside, climbing the ladder of power in the U.S. and now that they've attained it, they're not going to let their grip slip for anything. 

So I'm feeling pessimistic right now that Trump, or any non-leftist, will ever again preside over our country.

2422
Spin Zone / Re: Trump is done
« on: October 09, 2016, 04:55:05 PM »
I agree with both of you Gary and Anthony. I voted for Rubio in the primary. I think Trump is likely a narcissist.  But I think Hillary is a narcissist and a sociopath. Trump is just a garden variety pig. Hillary is dangerous.

2423
Spin Zone / Re: Trump is done
« on: October 08, 2016, 09:41:24 AM »
I listened to that whole thing.  If males DON'T behave like that the human species is done for.  This is entirely 100% normal male homo sapiens sapiens behavior. Trump has nothing to apologize for. Any males shocked are liars or have been so weakened by all the soy in our food supply or other sources of osmotic estrogen dosing (feminism in the media, trying to date today's entitlement brats of young females) that they truly believe this horseshit that men should not talk this way about women.  If anything is natural and evolutionary, this male behavior is. All Trump proved here is he is a virile male, or at least talks like one.

Any females shocked at this are either so young that they've swallowed hook line and sinker today's politically correct climate that all males are pedophiles and potential rapists, or are aged feminists who would like the male gender to be reduced to hobbled sperm donors and bank accounts, nothing more.  Anything hinting of testosterone is contemptible.  THAT is what the reaction to this video is proving: That this society is so anti-male today with the rotten fruits of bitter feminism and the most anti-nature ideology ever cooked up by man (leftism) that any display of normal male ardor can now be weaponized against any male not approved by the elite leftist machine.

2424
Spin Zone / Re: VP debate
« on: October 06, 2016, 03:41:51 PM »
The way Kaine kept interrupting Pence right from the start was one of the rudest, nastiest excuses for "debating" I have ever had the mispleasure of seeing. That guy is a piece of shit.

2425
Spin Zone / Re: Toy guns vs replicas vs real firearms
« on: September 25, 2016, 01:55:46 PM »
The odds of my home being victim to some sort of armed incursion are laughably small.  And I am not sufficiently stupid to risk my life defending insured property.

It's not the odds, it's the stakes. And it's less about defending insured property than defending your life.  Just a few blocks from my mother's house someone entered the home of an elderly lady and killed her, then took her property. I can list many other stories close to me,  including the young pregnant wife of my coworker, kidnapped, forced to get money from the ATM, then killed and her body dumped over a bridge into a river.  THAT funeral was a heartbreaker. By the way, she was white, they were black, but that doesn't make me hate all blacks or go riot in the streets. It does alert me to the level of hatred from SOME blacks toward whites, but I don't discriminate; I'm equally alert to white threats. My brother was approached alone in a dark parking lot by men (white) who began to flank him with obvious ill intent. He let the breeze blow open his jacket to reveal his pistol, and they stopped, backed off and left.  So you don't even need to USE a gun for it to save you. You don't even need to show it, hell, you don't even need to own one for gun rights to be protecting you. In areas where gun carry is legal your chance of being a victim is greatly reduced.  You're welcome.

I can't tell you the exact odds of my ever needing a gun, but it's simple and easy enough insurance to have. If it ever happens, I am ready, and I will live to enjoy my grandchildren. 

2426
I listened to that entire speech. Donald Trump was talking about ideological profiling and he went on to make that very plain. He was talking about finding out whether a refugee or would-immigrant had any signs of extremist leanings, any history or evidence of association with known terrorist organizations or sympathies with their cause.  He made this VERY plain. To say he was advocating profiling based on race is an outright lie.

2427
If you correct that to "folks haven't anything easier to do", then I'd agree with you.  There are better things to do, they just take a bit of hard work, getting up in the morning, not staying out late at night, being cordial to customers, etc...the adult things.  But to say that people are criminals because there are not other opportunities for them is just not believable.

To say they just don't have anything better to do (steingar's words) is kind of misstating it but I know what he means.  The way you put it in your last sentence is more accurate, they do it because there are not other opportunities.  I'm talking about the poverty stricken inner city folks.  At its most basic, people do what is most rational for their particular circumstance.  The deeply disenfranchised may actually, literally, have NO other opportunity.  Heck if I had zero job prospects, zero chance of a college education, had a low IQ from whatever drug my welfare mom did when I was a fetus, and whatever poor nutrition I was raised on, and lived with cockroaches, I might escape into drug using and drug pushing too.

I used to believe that inner city blacks were completely at fault for their own circumstance.  Personal accountability and all that.  And I still believe in personal accountability as a guiding principle, but a person can be accountable for only what is within the limit of their potential, their environment and their circumstance.  The things that got them trapped in the ghetto in the first place are forces beyond their control and so strong only those endowed with unusual intelligence and drive, plus no small amount of luck, escape. For the rest, at this point, many generations deep in that culture and lifestyle, it becomes almost a virtual impossibility to be anything different. THIS is the core problem that the Black Lives Matter movement is trying to express, although they are deeply stupid, criminal, misguided and evil.  The police are NOT the problem and not the enemy but they're too stupid to figure it all out.

For example, one major reason there are no jobs is that manufacturing vanished from the cities.  So what about entrepreneurs and small business?  Desegregation allowed the smarter, more ambitious blacks (the ones who started small businesses and the professionals, the doctor, lawyers and teachers) to move away.  It was a good thing for them, but a bad thing for those left behind, who no longer could benefit from the jobs that the ambitious blacks provided when they were confined to black areas of town AND from the stabilizing influence of those "higher quality" individuals in a neighborhood. Segregation is evil and it was right to end it but this was one of the unintended consequences.  No, railing against the police, who more than anything protect blacks against crime committed by blacks against their own selves is to COMPLETELY miss the point.  They should be railing against our trade policies that killed industry in the U.S., over regulation that has strangled small business, welfare and housing programs that have ruined the family and created generations of fatherless kids, raised without male discipline (who then turn to gang leaders as their alpha male role models), and last but not least, the insane "War on Drugs", a dismal failure on every front and possibly THE most damaging factor in all this mess, sending most of the males to prison before they have any chance at becoming a decent MAN.

So that's the black inner cities. What about everybody else?  In addition to the SAD making brains unhappy, I believe our culture has collectively become enablers.  In this I completely agree with you.  It's taking the easy way out to just do drugs instead of working for your next meal.  Assuming there IS a job out there for you, if it's not a fun job, and your parents let you live in the basement rent free, then why flip burgers? I think this pretty much defines the typical white middle class drug addict (excluding elderly disabled "accidental" addicts).

As for the rich Charlie Sheen types, drug addiction among celebrities is pandemic. What on earth makes people believe being rich and famous equates to being happy??  Those people are MISERABLE.  Ever put yourself in their shoes?  Being a famous musician or actor has got to be one of the most high pressure jobs possible, living under a microscope with the whole world judging you. Throw in any kind of complication such as being bipolar or having been abused as a child, and then being steeped in the partying scene and expected to be "on" for people all the time would make it very difficult to "just say no".

So it IS believable some people do it because there are just no opportunities, but others do it because the opportunities just aren't good enough to be worth it, and those I think are being enabled.  If you have a job that is very meaningful and rewarding, you're less likely to do drugs but if you get your engineering degree and can't find a job other than flipping burgers, and someone enables you by paying your rent and groceries, you escape worrying about your dismal career prospects by doing drugs. 

A lot of it is the work ethic is no longer being transmitted to the younger generations. Our whole culture is too soft on them, bubble wrapping them and making them expect robots and technology to do all the labor and all their thinking for them.  So I agree with you that the lack of work ethic is also a big contributing factor.

2428
There was a study where they gave rats a choice of drugs or a fun rat playground with lots to learn and do.  When they had the playground they shunned the drugs.  When just confined to a cage they took the drugs.  So I think Kristin is right, a large part of the drug problem is people in unpleasant circumstances and the worse the economy, the greater that problem.

Another big contributor, America is unhealthy due to our very bad diet, leading to disorders that lead to the prescriptions.  Then when they get addicted and can't afford the legal prescription or are cut off by the growing restrictiveness of getting them, they turn to cheap, available heroin.

And steingar is also right, it's nuts that we don't use the extremely safe and effective natural herb cannabis for certain conditions.  The medical establishment also shuns many other safe alternative treatments for example, kava is very effective for anxiety and way, way, way safer than benzodiazepines.  Valerian root and many other herbs are extremely effective sleep aids and much safer than Ambien.  I could go on and on. 

That article is very narrow, with a grain of truth but falls way short of painting the whole picture.  The black inner city community has complications that led then and still lead it's inhabitants to "need" to turn to the illegal drug market to earn money and gain status.  It's not like the small business community and job opportunities are thriving there.  I think it's not so much racism but simply that the larger general community didn't care as much until it hit them personally.  That's human nature.

The opiate problem is hitting the wider community now because of the bad economy, bad diet and health, the baby boom bump aging into the sick years of diabetes and surgeries.  It's unfair just to say doctors are overprescribing as the main cause when all these more distal reasons exist.  Also the legal restrictions contribute to the horrible outcomes.  Addicts turn to impure heroin and the needle when cut off from pills.  Addicts escalate dosage of pills containing acetaminophen because they're more common than pure opiate pills, and then destroy their livers.  Addicts overdose on an opiate usually after getting clean whether by choice or forced cold turkey because of inability to obtain the drug, and then relapsing and mistakenly going immediately back to the old dose. They die from combining opiates with alcohol or benzodiazepines.  Addicts sink farther into addiction and die because they don't seek help for fear of jail. Jailing them and giving them a criminal record creates a situation where it's harder for them to get a job when they get out, and now you're back to the unpleasant economic circumstance and the cycle repeats itself.

Cracking down on doctors' supplying pills is ineffective at curbing addiction.  However, it is very effective at making it difficult for non-addict pain patients to get the care they need. The addicts just turn to heroin and you will never stop the supply of that until you lock down the borders. That may or may not actually happen under Trump.  The solution at its most basic is first to fix the economy in general.   Also on my wish list but it'll never happen, is fix our food supply.  Healthy food is a happier brain that is less likely to seek drugs.  Drug addiction is largely an attempt to self medicate the brain diseases of our culture such as depression, anxiety, and ADHD, all of which begin in childhood when we give our kids sodas from a young age (combined with a genetic predisposition.  You could argue that sugar is a far more toxic drug than any opiate in terms of total cost to society from disease, suffering and death.) Next, education and treatment should be the focus, not criminal incarceration.  Damaging a person's ability to get and keep a job will never help them stay clean.

Our society is broken right now. Drug addiction is a symptom and a result, not the cause, if the rat experiment is to be believed.


2429
Pilot Zone / Re: Did TSA look into my laptop?
« on: May 23, 2016, 09:21:41 AM »
Welcome to Spin!  Good to see you here.

Last year, the screeners at LAX ruined a pair of shoes for me.  They sliced open the heels.  When I got off the plane at ORD the heels fell off.

Thanks!  Wow, you could try to file a claim.  I know you can do that and in theory they're supposed to make it right, but the problem is proving they did it.  I don't see how you can do that if you don't know the damage happened until you get to your destination.  It would probably be a waste of time.

Pages: 1 ... 160 161 [162]