2326
Spin Zone / Re: Cleansing of the gene pool - Friday edition
« on: August 20, 2018, 02:19:14 PM »
This couple reminds me of the couple that loved non-violent grizzly bears and got eaten by the sweet little things.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The rejection of "Nationalist identity" means the notion that you are an American is rejected and you view yourself as a person in the world living in an area cut off from all the other citizens by nationalistic borders.
Additionally, I think they do not hire people who bring "new ideas" to their company. They only hire people who bring an idea which is preapproved. They are hiring people to reinforce their echo chamber. I know that because they list a few ideas which are not tolerated and imply several more. 100% they do not want a conservative in their presence.
Yes.
My point actually has nothing to do with the price of Coke or people buying it and much more about the management of Coke blaming Trump for their "problem".
The management of Coca-Cola is exaggerating the impact of the tariffs so they can make more money.
I am replying to your post Scary Lucifer. Why does no one reply to You? I like You. ShamaLamaDingDong!
The problem is just internal (regulations, minimum wage laws, high taxes, unions, etc). That is certainly a big part of the problem though.
The tariffs Trump is proposing aren't just protectionist. They are retaliatory. Every other country has virtually free access to our markets. It just ain't the same the other way. Tariffs and restrictions against the import of American products overseas has been the accepted norm for years. We have been the proverbial frog in the pot. People have whined that jobs and manufacturing are leaving the US for years and blamed lazy greedy unions and high taxes, but another big part of the problem is that it is so hard to sell our goods over there, it was necessary to move manufacturing over there to gain market access.
So the problem wasn't just one or the other. It was both situations. And Trump is attacking both situations. And while there may be a little pain at first, we will be greater for it.
Isn't that what Trump promised and why we elected him?
Well, the belief about this girl is that she is an unregistered agent of Russia engaged in political activity in the US. That is against the law.
She was denied bail because there was a belief that she is a high flight risk.
Do you have reason to doubt that this is true?
QuoteThe real question that the Court didn't answer was - can the government require a person to act contrary to their sincere religious beliefs?.
The answer to that question is yes. It MUST be yes. And it IS yes.-
The trouble with yes is where that takes us. When human beings are denied the right to pursue their deep convictions, that is tyranny. There's nothing else to say about it. Our governments not only have no authority to suppress unpopular ideas, they have an obligation to protect them. I would say that it should be NO and in a just government, it IS no.
There is nothing inherently scandalous about using informants when investigating a presidential campaign, nor about seeking FISA warrants. Republican candidates and their campaigns are just as subject to the rule of law as Democrats, and it’s no less legitimate to investigate Trump than it was to investigate Hillary Clinton.
Newsflash - the vast, vast majority of liberals have little opinion on Israel, and certainly don't care enough to hate them. Most of the rest of them like Israel.
The number of liberals who are politically savvy enough to tow some supposed party-line hatred of Israel is minuscule.